reviewing reviews

Just curious, are people finding my quickie pseudo-reviews of role-playing games that strike my fancy interesting? Understandable? Too much information? Not enough? Anything you'd like to see? Admittedly there isn't much in the way of critical thought behind them, just, excited shouting of "this is kewl." <grin> ETA: Well it seems that I am hitting the right sort of level for people's interests. I was worried it was becoming rather overcomplicated. But the problem is these games are full of chunky goodness. Kind of like Luncheon Meat #1, except in reverse. Maybe I should try reviewing something uninteresting, but then again I say any game has something useful to offer, even if it is simply "please for the love of the Goddess, don't ever do something like this!" Hmmm. Maybe I should review Elderad or The Iberian Tribunal. Unfortunately I'd need a video camera to record it. But the flames sure are pretty. So the good is where you find it. The reviews shall continue, my loyal reader!

well it certainly beats dante's easter saturday...

Just had a relaxing and extremely enjoyable morning tea,* catching up with a dear friend who had recently escaped from the inhospitable wilds of Melbourne. Albiet, unfortunately, for a very short time, before she is doomed to return. I'd forgotten how fun it can be to discuss arts and culture these days, since most of my current social group are not inclined in that direction (although I still don't miss the artificial snobbery that is endemic to any "High" Arts scene). Now I really must get back to working out how to smuggle a six foot tall package out of CERN without the customs officials noticing it squirming a lot and the muffled cries for help... <grin> * If you can call a 4 hour session morning tea (outside of the public service), although does the ordering of raisin toast actually make it qualify as lunch? Ponders.